(1973/10/18) Coyne Helicopter incident

From Razing-Wiki

This is a strong case:

1. disconnection from radio chatter indicating interference (or hoax)
2. numerous corroborating witnesses
3. two sets of unconnected witnesses
4. irregular flight maneuvers (ruling out atmospheric), stopped mid-flight, and performed a 45 degree turn.
5. shown a green light through the cockpit of the helicopter indicating some form of technology.
6. unlikely a manned secret craft of any sort:
   1. a fixed-wing aircraft moving across the line of sight would appear to move most rapidly when passing directly in front of the observer;
   2. a fixed-wing aircraft would not have the capability of decelerating from high velocity to "hover" within a few seconds time;
   3. a helicopter would have the capability of hovering, but would not be capable of the high forward speeds reported;
   4. a conventional aircraft, if within 500 to 1,000 feet, would have produced noise audible inside the helicopter;
   5. the FAA requires either a strobe or a rotating beacon on either the top or bottom of the fuselage,
   6. FAA requires that no aircraft shall fly below 10,000 feet msl at speeds above 250 knots;
   7. some of the features of a conventional aircraft would have been seen, e.g., wings, engine pods, windows, empennage, numbers, logo.

Contents 1 Notes 2 References 3 Further Reading 4 External Links

Notes

References

Further Reading

External Links

• NUFORC Evaluation of the Coyne Helicopter incident